Admin System Review
This page is for Landmark team members.
Enter the password to continue.
This page is for Landmark team members.
Enter the password to continue.
This report presents findings from a comprehensive two-day on-site operations audit conducted at Landmark Real Estate Management on March 5–6, 2026. The audit included in-depth interviews with twelve staff members spanning executive leadership, department heads, front desk operations, property management, application processing, accounting (controller and staff accountant), commercial property management, and senior portfolio management. Additionally, four pre-audit questionnaire responses and Landmark’s full EOS accountability chart were reviewed.
Landmark manages approximately 4,000 residential and commercial units across the Bellingham, Washington market, serving roughly 10,000 tenants for third-party property owners. The company operates with 57 office staff, 4 field staff, and 10 residential property managers organized into a pod structure. Annual revenue is under $10 million with a net profit margin exceeding 15 percent. The company spends over $411,000 annually on software, with AppFolio as its core platform at approximately $22,000 per month.
The audit uncovered a critical finding that was confirmed across every interview: LeadSimple, the workflow management platform introduced in late 2025, is creating more inefficiency than it solves. Property managers report that it doubles or triples data entry, cannot handle edge cases, and communicates only one way with AppFolio. The tool was described by one 11-year veteran PM as providing “zero added value” and by front desk staff as a system they cannot fully launch because other teams refuse to use it. This single issue compounds virtually every other bottleneck identified in the organization.
Beyond LeadSimple, the audit identified critical opportunities in five areas: application processing (5-day average turnaround confirmed, 2 days wasted on PM approval, SafeRent’s 6-person group limit, Section 8/assisted programs comprising ~25% of applications taking 2–3 weeks with entirely manual processes), maintenance management (3,000+ monthly calls with zero automation, vendors not closing work orders), owner and tenant communication (reactive culture, decentralized phone system, 50–60% PM call answer rate vs 90% front desk), accounting operations (500–600 manual receipts per month consuming 70% of staff time in first two weeks, no bulk receipting, QuickBooks workaround needed because AppFolio cannot add sales tax), and financial operations (manual Excel analysis, no custom reporting, key-person dependency on the CFO).
Total estimated annual savings from implementing the recommended changes: $370,000–$622,000+, with the most impactful being the deployment of a centralized AI voice agent ($80K–$120K), application process automation ($75K–$150K), and the strategic decision on LeadSimple’s future (eliminating $72K/year in direct cost plus an estimated $100K+ in lost productivity from double data entry). Confirmed costs: SafeRent $4,000/month, AppFolio ACH processing $4,000/month ($1/unit), Pattern AI $1,300/month.
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Landmark Real Estate Management |
| Location | Bellingham, Washington (1 office) |
| Broker/Owner | Troy Muljat |
| Business Type | Third-Party Property Management (Residential & Commercial) |
| Units Under Management | ~4,000 |
| Tenant Population | ~10,000 |
| Annual Unit Turnover | ~1,500 units/year (~40% turnover rate) |
| Revenue | Under $10M annually |
| Net Profit Margin | 15%+ |
| Staff | 57 office + 4 field = 61 total + 3 Philippines (applications) + 1 India (accounting) |
| Residential Property Managers | 10 (organized under 3 Senior Portfolio Managers) |
| Commercial Property Managers | 2 (Eileen Monahan, Kristina Pollard) |
| Commercial Portfolio | ~600 units / 1.1 million sq ft |
| Business Split | ~85% Residential / ~15% Commercial |
| Tenant Payment Mix | 87% ACH / 13% Checks |
| Growth Ambition | Quadruple company size (stated by Troy) |
Landmark follows the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) framework with a Visionary/Integrator model. The full accountability chart, printed March 5, 2026, reveals the following leadership structure:
| Role | Name | Tenure | Key Responsibilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visionary (Owner) | Troy Muljat | Founder | Client relationships, R&D, culture, creative problem solving |
| Integrator (COO) | Kim Huizenga | 18 years | LMA, P&L, business plan execution, obstacle removal, cross-org communication |
| CFO | Mike Haveman | 7 years | Forecasting, budgets, compliance/audits, property & LM accounting |
| Director of PM Ops | Leslie Medina | 9 years | LMA, client experience, process development, legal updates, training |
| Executive Assistant | Amber Herman | — | Special projects, software integration, LeadSimple expert, R&D |
| Office Manager | Wendy Hanks | — | Front desk staffing, guest services, purchasing |
| Controller | Lisa Robertsen | — | Transactional/financial statement auditing, property on/offboarding |
| Lead App Specialist | Jillian Scott | — | Application processing, COT processing, training, work distribution |
Below the leadership team, three Senior Portfolio Managers (Emileigh Kinnear, Eric Canfield, Ben Robinett for commercial) each oversee a cluster of property managers. Each residential PM pod consists of a Property Manager, an Assistant PM, and a Lead Guest Showing/Marketing & Advertising agent. The company is transitioning from a centralized department model to this pod structure, with one team (Tia Herring as leasing agent for Katherine Roberts and Josh Holland) currently piloting the new model.
The accountability chart also reveals Signature Maintenance, an in-house maintenance division being ramped up, as well as a remote staff accountant based in India (Jithin Jeevalan) handling accounts payable, invoicing, and insurance audits. HR is managed through Rippling with a newly hired HR Manager. IT is outsourced to Hemisphere Solutions.
The leadership team operates on EOS with weekly L10 meetings via Ninety.io. Quarterly performance reviews and annual planning sessions are in place. The 2025 theme was “Driving Change”; the 2026 theme is “Maintaining Accountability,” reflecting the leadership’s awareness that change adoption is their central challenge.
Critical finding: There is a significant perception gap between leadership and front-line staff. Leadership views LeadSimple as a necessary standardization tool that needs time to mature. Property managers and front desk staff view it as a system that doubles their workload and provides no value. The controller (Lisa) occupies a middle ground, understanding the strategic intent but acknowledging the implementation pain. This disconnect, if unresolved, will undermine any future technology initiative.
Key personnel risks: Mike (CFO) has no trained backup and performs all financial analysis manually in Excel. Amber is the sole LeadSimple architect and the only person driving software integration. If either becomes unavailable, their respective domains would be severely impacted. The team explicitly acknowledged this.
Landmark spends $34,284/month ($411,408 annually) across the following platforms. AppFolio accounts for approximately 64% of total software spend.
| Platform | Function | Est. Monthly Cost | Staff Sentiment |
|---|---|---|---|
| AppFolio | Core PMS, Accounting, CRM, Comms, Tenant Portal | ~$22,000 | High satisfaction — “best middle of the road” PMS |
| LeadSimple | Workflow/Process Management | ~$6,000 | Very low — PMs report it doubles work |
| SafeRent | Tenant Screening | ~$4,000 | Mixed — good output, broke auto-screening, 6-person limit |
| ShowMojo | Showing Scheduling | Incl. | Positive — better than AppFolio showings |
| Z Inspector | Move-in/Move-out Inspections | Incl. | Positive — integrates with AppFolio |
| Pattern AI | Commercial Lease Abstraction | ~$1,300 | Underutilized — credit-based, 2-year prepay |
| Matterport | 3D Property Tours | Incl. | Useful but incomplete coverage |
| Rippling | HR, Payroll, Time Tracking | Incl. | Neutral |
| Ninety.io | EOS Meeting & Accountability | Incl. | Positive |
| MailChimp | Email Marketing | Incl. | Unknown — purpose unclear to leadership |
| RingCentral | VoIP Phone System | Incl. | Negative — downgrade from Dialpad |
| Utility Profit | Utility Account Setup for Tenants | Incl. | Negative — looks like spam email |
| Simple In and Out | Employee Location Tracking | Incl. | Low adoption |
| SharePoint/OneDrive | Document Storage | Incl. | Neutral — “junk drawer” per PM |
| Phone Tenders (Virtually inCredible) | After-Hours Call Service | Incl. | Functional |
Additional tools/workarounds identified: Pre-Leasing Spreadsheet (10–15 years old, still active), Holding Fee Spreadsheet, Master Move-Out Spreadsheet, Inspections & Showings Spreadsheet, Dropbox Tracking Spreadsheet, and manual Craigslist postings. The company does not use a password manager. MFA is enforced for “most” systems.
This is the most significant technology finding of the audit and was confirmed by every non-leadership interviewee. LeadSimple was introduced in late 2025 as a workflow management layer on top of AppFolio, intended to standardize processes, enable training, and create accountability visibility. In practice, it has become the single most frustrating tool in the organization.
The core problem: LeadSimple can pull data from AppFolio but cannot write data back. This means every action taken in LeadSimple must be manually replicated in AppFolio. Property managers report entering the same information 3–5 times across LeadSimple, AppFolio, and spreadsheets for a single transaction. One 11-year veteran PM managing 420 units described it as “an infomercial product” and “a glorified Outlook extension.”
Specific issues reported by end users across multiple interviews:
Recommendation: Conduct a 30-day LeadSimple evaluation with clear success criteria. If the bi-directional data problem cannot be solved (via API middleware, Supergood reverse-engineered API, or headless browser automation), seriously consider sunsetting LeadSimple and investing in maximizing AppFolio’s native workflows (Realm-X Performers), supplemented by custom automation where gaps exist. The $72K/year direct cost plus estimated $100K+ in lost productivity from double entry makes this the highest-ROI decision in the organization.
When Landmark switched from AppFolio’s native screening to SafeRent in December 2025, two critical issues emerged:
Landmark recently switched from Dialpad to RingCentral for their VoIP phone system. Multiple interviewees reported this was a downgrade. Dialpad provided call history, caller identification, and clean AI transcription. RingCentral provides only basic caller ID and its AI notes feature interrupts active calls by announcing “this call is being recorded by AI notes” multiple times during conversations, upsetting tenants and disrupting customer service. RingCentral was selected for its back-end reporting capabilities for leadership, but front-line staff report the daily user experience is significantly worse. RingCentral is also more expensive than Dialpad.
Despite AppFolio containing most of the same data, the front desk maintains at least 4–5 active shared spreadsheets: a Holding Fee Spreadsheet, Master Move-Out Spreadsheet, Inspections & Showings Spreadsheet, Dropbox Tracking Spreadsheet, and the legacy Pre-Leasing Spreadsheet. Front desk staff enter holding fee data in three separate places (AppFolio unit page, the spreadsheet, and ShowMojo). Each spreadsheet was created reactively in response to a single incident (e.g., a lost check) and persists as a permanent process. The controller (Lisa) has been working to eliminate some, but adoption is slow.
New tenants receive emails from “Utility Profit” (via sunporch.net) to set up utility accounts. The emails resemble phishing attempts, lack a professional favicon, and have no visual connection to Landmark. A PM reported that the initial data migration had units in the same building listed in different cities. This creates a poor first impression at a critical moment in the tenant relationship.
Front desk staff confirmed that approximately 95% of all inbound calls (5,000–10,000/month) come through the front desk. Only owners with direct PM numbers bypass this. Approximately 30% of all calls (~3,000/month) are maintenance-related, taking 5–10+ minutes each. That equates to roughly 250–500 hours per month of phone time on maintenance alone, handled by 3 front desk staff who are simultaneously managing walk-ins, holding fee collection, key check-outs, move-in packets, and spreadsheet data entry.
Tenants must pay holding fees (25% of one month’s rent) via cashier’s check or money order, in person at the office. This creates a built-in delay in the application process. Online payment via Stripe was recently approved but is “stuck in committee” regarding implementation. For a company targeting college-age renters who overwhelmingly prefer digital payments, this is a significant friction point. One PM has been advocating for Apple Pay and QR-code-based payments at showings.
The application-to-lease process was confirmed by Jillian Scott (Lead Application Specialist) to average 5 days from submission to lease delivery, against a goal of 4 days. This figure excludes Section 8 and assisted program applications, which average 2–3 weeks. The application team consists of Jill plus 3 application specialists based in the Philippines who work remotely during US nighttime hours. The end-to-end flow:
One PM is piloting a streamlined process: Heather Vermaat now skips the flow sheet entirely and sends leases directly from AppFolio upon approval, cutting out the application specialist round-trip. Early results are positive. This should be validated and expanded.
The 5-day average breaks down approximately as follows: Day 1–2 is consumed by waiting for all group members to submit applications (cannot screen partial groups because SafeRent evaluates combined income) and the manual screen button delay. Day 2–3 is SafeRent processing (instant for 80% of applicants via credit/criminal, but income verification via Plaid/Work Number causes delays for 20%, and CrimeSafe criminal history checks can take up to a week for certain jurisdictions like South Carolina). Day 3–5 is the PM approval round-trip, which Jill confirmed takes an average of 2 days. She stated that approximately 50% of PMs do not meaningfully review the application and simply approve it, making this step functionally a rubber stamp that adds 2 days to every lease.
A previously unidentified bottleneck: approximately 25% of Landmark’s applications involve Section 8 housing vouchers or other housing assistance programs (promissory notes from case managers, BHA inspections). These applications take 2–3 weeks to process and are entirely manual. The process requires: receiving the voucher, having the applicant sign a BHA form, having the PM complete the form, submitting to BHA, waiting for BHA inspection (which often fails on minor maintenance items), getting maintenance completed, re-inspection, and final approval. Applicants frequently switch units mid-process when inspections fail, restarting the cycle. The application team currently excludes these from their average processing time, masking the true workload. With income verification, case manager communication, and BHA coordination all being manual, this represents a significant automation opportunity.
Additionally, Landmark maintains a 4% denial rate and actively works to approve borderline applicants, which is admirable for tenant experience but adds significant manual work as specialists negotiate conditional approvals, co-signers, and alternative income documentation.
Maintenance requests come through the AppFolio tenant portal. The PM assistant reviews, contacts the tenant for additional info, determines the vendor, and dispatches. Owner approval is required over $500. The audit confirmed that 30% of all inbound calls (~3,000/month) are maintenance-related, and there is zero automation in the follow-up process.
Eric Canfield manages 4 PM teams (~1,600 units, recently reduced from 5 teams/~2,000 units). His primary function is auditing PM performance across vacancy management, delinquency follow-up, move-in/move-out completion, and vendor invoice processing. He currently runs reports in AppFolio, manually filters by PM, and reviews each metric individually. He explicitly requested a single KPI dashboard with clickable drill-down for each PM showing: vacancies over X days, delinquencies over $500 missing notes, pending move-outs approaching 21-day deadline, and pending move-ins.
Eric also confirmed that move-out accounting was, until very recently, entirely paper-based: PMs handwrote notes on printed invoices, placed them in a physical folder, and walked it to accounting for manual data entry. The team is just now transitioning to digital entry via LeadSimple. Eric views LeadSimple’s workflows as “head and shoulders above” AppFolio’s native workflows for comprehensiveness but acknowledges the one-directional data flow as the fatal flaw. He estimates it will take a year for LeadSimple to reach its potential.
PM call answer rates: Eric confirmed the front desk achieves ~90% answer rates, while property managers average only 50–60%. This gap drives repeat calls, escalations, and negative reviews. He also noted that approximately 20% of inbound calls are likely repeat calls from the same person.
Commercial operations manage approximately 600 units across 1.1 million square feet (industrial, shopping centers, office buildings, executive suites). Commercial is entirely separate from residential: there is no in-house leasing (Troy’s brokerage team handles all commercial leasing), and LeadSimple has not been introduced to the commercial side yet. All workflows remain in AppFolio.
The commercial team consists of 2 PMs (Eileen and Kristina) plus assistants, managed by SPM Ben Robinett. Key commercial-specific challenges: triple net lease complexity (every lease has unique provisions for expense pass-through, management fees, caps, and exclusions), lease date complexity (lease signature date, lease start date, rent commencement date, and occupancy date can all differ), and commercial accountant Matthew Sauber must manually read every lease to set up recurring charges in AppFolio.
Pattern AI ($1,300/month) was purchased for commercial lease abstraction but is underutilized. The platform UI was described as poorly formatted with no billing history visible and unclear token usage. Troy and the team view it as a “vibe-coded project that’s not completed.” The strategic intent is correct—automated lease abstraction would save significant time for triple net reconciliation—but the tool needs deeper integration with AppFolio to realize its potential.
Eileen, with 15 years of commercial PM experience, noted that commercial maintenance is less volume but more complex (HVAC systems, fire alarms, industrial equipment) compared to residential’s high-volume, repetitive requests. The same vendor close-out problem exists on the commercial side. Commercial also writes approximately 150 leases per year for clients as a revenue stream.
Owner communication was identified by Leslie (Director of PM Ops) as the most significant service delivery gap. PMs are expected to proactively report on property performance but default to reactive communication. Owners discover extended vacancies through their own report reviews. Amber built a LeadSimple vacancy workflow with a checklist, but managers skip past it entirely.
Mike’s insight: Leadership has explored Blanket Homes, which provides an automated owner reporting portal with dashboards, property value tracking, and proactive communication tools. They are also evaluating Hemlane and Revela as potential platforms that could handle this natively.
Calendar saturation from listing all similar units individually, Matterport coverage gaps, manual Craigslist posting, and the 10–15 year old pre-leasing spreadsheet remain as identified bottlenecks. The pod transition should improve showing agent knowledge of specific properties, but the underlying calendar management issue requires a unit grouping strategy for multifamily buildings.
Communication channels include AppFolio portal, AppFolio texting, RingCentral calls, RingCentral texting, email (Outlook), Teams chat, in-person visits, and Simple In and Out for employee tracking. A PM described it as: “Imagine seven tenants in one house contacting you in five different ways each. It’s a fire hose to the face.”
| Metric | Current State |
|---|---|
| Annual Revenue | Under $10M |
| Net Profit Margin | 15%+ |
| Annual Software Spend | $411,408 ($34,284/month) |
| AppFolio ACH Processing | $4,000/month ($1/unit/door) |
| SafeRent Screening | ~$4,000/month (confirmed) |
| Pattern AI | ~$1,300/month (2-year credit prepay) |
| Top Overhead: Payroll | 64% |
| Top Overhead: Technology | 5% |
| Invoices Per Week | 200+ |
| Invoice Processing Time | 7–14 days |
| Month-End Close | 1–2 weeks, 6 people |
| Deposits Held | $12–20 million at any time |
| Opportunity | Impact | Complexity | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto-trigger SafeRent screening | High — eliminates 2–4 day delay | Low | Immediate |
| Re-enable SafeRent adverse action letters | Medium | Very Low | Immediate |
| Expand Heather’s lease-direct pilot to all PMs | High — removes flow sheet round-trip | Very Low | Immediate |
| Implement Stripe/Apple Pay for holding fees | Medium — removes in-person payment barrier | Low | Immediate |
| RingCentral ↔ AppFolio integration setup | Medium — caller context for front desk | Low | Immediate |
| Deploy centralized AI voice agent | Very High — handles 5K–10K calls/month | Medium | High |
| Automated tenant maintenance status updates | High — reduces 3,000 monthly calls | Medium | High |
| Automated monthly owner reports | High — proactive communication | Medium | High |
| LeadSimple evaluation / sunset decision | Very High — $72K/yr + $100K+ lost productivity | Low (decision) / High (migration) | High |
| AI maintenance intake (troubleshooting + triage) | High — faster dispatch, fewer callbacks | Medium | High |
| Eliminate spreadsheets (holding fee, move-out, etc.) | Medium — reduces triple data entry | Low–Medium | Medium |
| Automated vacancy alerts with owner comms | High | Medium | Medium |
| Financial analytics dashboard for CFO | Medium — frees CFO time | Medium | Medium |
| Automated co-signer follow-up sequences | Medium | Low | Medium |
| Z Inspector auto work-order creation training | Medium | Very Low | Medium |
| SafeRent group size workaround (>6 applicants) | Medium — critical for pre-leasing season | Medium | Medium |
| Section 8/Assisted Programs workflow automation | Medium — 25% of apps, 2–3 week manual process | Medium | Medium |
| Browser automation for receipt entry (Alyssa) | High — reclaims 70% of first-two-week time | Low | Medium |
| SPM KPI dashboard with one-click audits | Medium — improves oversight of 4,000+ units | Medium | Medium |
| Move PM approval to application dept (standard apps) | High — eliminates 2-day delay | Very Low | High |
| Utility Profit replacement/rebrand | Low — tenant experience improvement | Low | Low |
| Triple net reconciliation automation | Medium | High | Low |
| AppFolio write-back via Supergood/Skywalk API | Very High — enables all other integrations | High | Ongoing R&D |
Estimated savings: 40–80 hours/month. Zero or minimal development cost.
Estimated savings: 150–300+ hours/month. Significant tenant and owner experience improvement.
| Category | Current Cost | Projected Savings | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application Processing | $50/day/unit vacancy | $75K–$150K/yr | 2–3 day reduction across 1,500 turns |
| AI Voice Agent | 3 staff + lost calls | $80K–$120K/yr | Reduced headcount need + recovered leads |
| LeadSimple Decision | $72K/yr + double entry | $100K–$172K/yr | Direct cost + productivity recovery for 10+ PMs |
| Owner Communication | PM time + lost owners | $30K–$50K/yr | Reduced churn, referral increase, PM time savings |
| Maintenance Automation | 3,000 calls + delayed dispatch | $40K–$60K/yr | Faster resolution, fewer repeat calls |
| Flow Sheet Elimination | Redundant data entry | $15K–$25K/yr | Time savings across 1,500 leases/year |
| Financial Reporting | CFO manual Excel | $20K–$30K/yr | Reduced hours + faster month-end close |
| Holding Fee Online | In-person collection process | $10K–$15K/yr | Front desk time + faster leasing |
| Receipt Entry Automation | 70% of accountant time for 2 weeks/month | $15K–$25K/yr | Browser automation for 500–600 monthly receipts |
| Section 8 Workflow Automation | 2–3 week manual process, ~25% of apps | $20K–$30K/yr | Automated forms, BHA tracking, case mgr comms |
| PM Approval Elimination (standard) | 2-day delay on every standard application | $30K–$50K/yr | App dept approves standard apps, PMs handle exceptions |
Total Estimated Annual Savings: $445,000 – $742,000
The most politically sensitive recommendation in this report is the LeadSimple evaluation. Leadership invested significant time, money, and political capital in this tool. Amber built the workflows. The strategic intent (standardization for scale) is correct. But the implementation has failed to deliver value and is actively harming productivity and morale. The audit strongly recommends a data-driven 30-day evaluation rather than an emotional decision in either direction. If the bi-directional data problem can be solved, LeadSimple could fulfill its intended purpose. If it cannot, the cost of continuing exceeds the cost of transitioning.
Troy stated a goal of quadrupling the company’s size. At 4,000 units, growing to 16,000 units with the current tech stack is not feasible. The audit recommends a “simplify before you multiply” approach:
| Name | Role | Session / Day |
|---|---|---|
| Troy Muljat | Broker/Owner (Visionary) | Day 1: Executive Team + Pre-Audit Forms; Day 2: Findings Debrief |
| Kim Huizenga | COO (Integrator, 18 years) | Day 1: Executive Team Interview |
| Mike Haveman | CFO (7 years) | Day 1: Executive Team + Pre-Audit + Software Review; Day 2: Debrief |
| Leslie Medina | Director of PM Operations (9 years) | Day 1: Department Head Interview |
| Amber Herman | Executive Asst / LeadSimple Expert | Day 1: Process Deep-Dive + Systems Review |
| Lolly (Front Desk) | Front Desk Guest Relations | Day 1: Front-Line Operations Interview |
| Katherine Roberts | Residential PM (11 years, 420 units) | Day 1: End-User Perspective Interview |
| Lisa Robertsen | Controller | Day 1: Financial Operations Interview |
| Jillian Scott | Lead Application Specialist | Day 2: Application Process Deep-Dive |
| Alyssa Molina-Epton | Staff Accountant (A/R) | Day 2: Accounting Operations Interview |
| Eileen Monahan | Commercial Property Manager (15 years) | Day 2: Commercial Operations Interview |
| Eric Canfield | Senior Portfolio Manager | Day 2: Oversight & KPI Needs Interview |
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Units Managed | ~4,000 |
| Tenant Population | ~10,000 |
| Annual Unit Turnover | ~1,500 (40%) |
| Monthly Inbound Calls | 5,000–10,000 (95% through front desk) |
| Maintenance Calls | ~30% of total (~3,000/month) |
| Front Desk Phone Staff | 3 (also handle walk-ins, payments, data entry) |
| Monthly Software Spend | $34,284 |
| AppFolio Monthly Cost | ~$22,000 |
| LeadSimple Est. Monthly Cost | ~$6,000 |
| Residential PMs | 10 |
| Commercial PMs | 2 |
| Units per PM Pod | ~400 (max ~525) |
| Application Average Processing Time | 5 days (excl. Section 8/assisted) |
| Section 8/Assisted Processing Time | 2–3 weeks |
| Section 8/Assisted % of Applications | ~25% |
| Application Team | 1 lead (Jill) + 3 specialists (Philippines) |
| Application Denial Rate | 4% |
| PM Approval Delay | ~2 days average (50% don’t meaningfully review) |
| Application Screening Delay | 1–2 days (manual button) |
| SafeRent Group Limit | 6 (college houses need 8–16+) |
| SafeRent Monthly Cost | ~$4,000 |
| AppFolio ACH Cost | $4,000/month ($1/unit) |
| Pattern AI Monthly Cost | ~$1,300 (underutilized) |
| Flow Sheet Fields | 17 (most redundant with AppFolio) |
| Active Shared Spreadsheets | 4–5 |
| Holding Fee Data Entry Locations | 3 (AppFolio, spreadsheet, ShowMojo) |
| Deposits Under Management | $12–20 million |
| Tenant Payment: ACH | 87% |
| Monthly Receipt Volume (Alyssa) | 500–600 first week of month |
| Receipt Entry Time | 70% of accountant time, weeks 1–2 |
| Commercial Units | ~600 (1.1M sq ft) |
| Commercial Leases Written/Year | ~150 |
| Front Desk Call Answer Rate | ~90% |
| PM Call Answer Rate | 50–60% |
| Properties Added (Last 12 Months) | 500+ |
| After-Hours Service | Phone Tenders (Virtually inCredible) |
End of Report